Pages are not being indexed
Important URLs remain excluded, discovered but not indexed, or difficult to diagnose from reporting alone.
Technical SEO services
Technical SEO that finds—and fixes—what holds growth back.
Connect crawlability, rendering, indexation, architecture and real-user performance to an implementation plan your team can act on and verify.
Where diagnosis begins
Technical symptoms are clues—not conclusions.
We trace visible problems back through templates, delivery, discovery and indexing before prescribing a fix.
Rankings dropped after a redesign
Templates, redirects, canonicals, internal links or rendered content changed during launch.
The website feels slow
Real visitors encounter delayed loading, slow interaction or unstable layouts across important templates.
Google is crawling the wrong URLs
Parameters, duplicates and low-value URL patterns compete with the pages the business needs discovered.
JavaScript content is not discovered
Important copy, links or metadata depend on rendering paths that are incomplete, delayed or inconsistent.
Organic traffic declined unexpectedly
A technical change, indexing pattern or site-wide quality issue needs evidence-led isolation—not guesswork.
What good technical work enables
A clearer path from discovery to useful experience.
Better crawling and indexation
Make important pages easier to discover, retrieve, interpret and monitor while reducing avoidable URL noise.
Faster, more stable experiences
Prioritise field performance and template-level improvements that help real visitors—not a perfect lab score.
Stronger conditions for organic growth
Create a dependable technical foundation for useful content, authority and conversion work to perform.
Technical SEO services
Choose the constraint. See the investigation.
Every workstream connects evidence, implementation and validation. Select an area to explore the scope.
Turn technical evidence into an implementation plan.
We connect crawl data, indexation evidence, templates, internal links, performance and business priority—then separate urgent constraints from lower-value housekeeping.
Full-site crawl
Review status codes, directives, canonicals, links, depth and URL patterns across the accessible site.
Search Console evidence
Compare crawl findings with Page Indexing, performance and enhancement reports where access permits.
Template diagnosis
Trace repeated problems to layouts, CMS rules, rendering or infrastructure rather than treating every URL manually.
Impact-led roadmap
Define severity, affected templates, expected value, dependencies, owner and a practical acceptance test.
Help search systems reach the right version of the right page.
For most sites, useful internal links, accurate sitemaps and clear indexing signals matter more than advanced crawl-budget work. Large or fast-changing sites receive the deeper crawl-demand analysis they require.
Robots controls
Review robots.txt, meta robots and response headers for accidental blocks or conflicting instructions.
XML sitemaps
Keep canonical, indexable and current URLs in clean, segmented sitemaps that support diagnosis.
Discovery paths
Ensure priority pages can be reached through crawlable links and useful site architecture.
Indexation patterns
Group exclusions by cause, template and business importance before recommending changes.
Improve real-user loading, interaction and visual stability.
We distinguish field data from lab diagnostics and use the current good thresholds at the 75th percentile: LCP within 2.5 seconds, INP within 200 milliseconds and CLS at 0.1 or less.
Field-data baseline
Segment real-user evidence by template, device and traffic context before choosing priorities.
Lab diagnosis
Use repeatable tests to isolate main-thread work, render delays, media cost and layout movement.
Delivery improvements
Coordinate caching, server response, scripts, CSS, fonts and media with the development team.
Post-release validation
Re-test the implementation and monitor field data as enough real-user observations accumulate.
Make page relationships clear to people and crawlers.
Navigation, contextual links, hubs and depth should express the real information structure—not manufacture artificial importance.
Information structure
Map services, products, locations and resources around user tasks and business priorities.
Crawlable internal links
Use descriptive HTML links that remain usable without interaction-dependent discovery.
Orphan-page review
Find valuable URLs absent from the navigable site and decide whether to connect, consolidate or retire them.
Depth and prominence
Review how templates distribute attention to priority and supporting pages.
Consolidate equivalent URLs without hiding genuine differences.
Canonical tags are one signal among several. We align redirects, internal links, sitemap URLs and canonical declarations so they communicate the same preferred version.
Canonical consistency
Test self-referencing and cross-page canonicals against status, content and intended indexation.
Duplicate clusters
Identify parameters, print paths, variants, copied templates and protocol or hostname duplication.
CMS rule review
Correct template logic that generates conflicting or non-existent canonical destinations.
Consolidation plan
Choose redirects, canonicalization, noindex or content differentiation based on the actual use case.
Describe visible page meaning with eligible, maintainable markup.
Valid structured data can make a page eligible for supported search features, but it does not guarantee a rich result. Markup must match visible content and current platform policies.
Eligibility review
Choose supported types that genuinely describe the page rather than marking up everything available.
Template implementation
Generate complete, consistent JSON-LD from reliable CMS fields where practical.
Validation
Test syntax, required properties, visible-content alignment and representative rendered pages.
Monitoring
Track enhancement reports and update implementations when content or platform requirements change.
Make every response explain what happened to the URL.
Clear status behavior protects user journeys, supports migrations and keeps crawlers from wasting time on chains, loops and misleading soft errors.
Redirect mapping
Map replaced URLs to the closest useful destination instead of sending everything to a homepage.
Chains and loops
Resolve multi-hop paths and circular behavior across links, canonicals and edge rules.
Error handling
Return honest 404 or 410 responses while offering visitors useful navigation.
Migration controls
Define pre-launch mapping, launch QA and post-launch monitoring for changed URL estates.
Keep the mobile version complete, usable and equivalent.
Google predominantly uses the mobile version for indexing and ranking. We check content, links, metadata, structured data, images and interaction behavior across responsive states.
Content parity
Ensure primary information, headings and descriptive image alternatives remain present on mobile.
Link parity
Keep meaningful discovery paths available without relying on fragile interaction states.
Rendering and viewport
Test responsive templates, overlays, resource loading and mobile JavaScript behavior.
Mobile performance
Prioritise real-device loading and interaction constraints on the templates that matter.
When scale changes the method
Technical SEO for complex digital estates.
Some websites need more than a standard crawl. Their URL systems, rendering paths, locales or rate of change alter how evidence should be collected and how risk should be controlled.
Diagnostic core
One website.
One website.
Several technical systems.
RankSpell chooses the evidence and validation method around the estate—not a universal checklist.
- URL behavior
- Rendered output
- Server evidence
- Search signals
Faceted ecommerce estates
Control filter, sort, search and pagination URLs while preserving useful product discovery and genuinely valuable landing pages.
JavaScript and headless platforms
Test delivered HTML, rendered output, crawlable links, metadata, hydration and failure states across representative templates.
International and multilingual sites
Align locale URLs, canonicals, language signals, hreflang clusters, sitemaps and internal discovery without forced redirects.
Large or rapidly changing sites
Use crawl evidence, Search Console, server behavior and logs where available to understand crawl demand, capacity and URL waste.
How the work moves
From diagnosis to verified release.
Six stages keep evidence, ownership and quality assurance connected.
- 01
Discovery
Clarify business priorities, platform constraints, recent changes, known symptoms and available data.
- 02
Technical investigation
Combine crawling, rendering, Search Console, field performance and template inspection.
- 03
Impact-based prioritisation
Score findings by affected value, confidence, risk, effort and implementation dependency.
- 04
Implementation support
Translate findings into developer-ready requirements, examples and acceptance criteria.
- 05
Quality assurance
Test representative URLs, templates and edge cases before and after release.
- 06
Monitoring and reporting
Watch indexation, crawl behavior, field performance and organic outcomes without claiming guaranteed rankings.
Migration and release protection
Protect search continuity before, during and after launch.
-
01 Control phaseBefore launch
Build the control baseline before URLs, templates or infrastructure change.
- Inventory current URLs and organic entry pages
- Benchmark indexation, templates and field performance
- Map every changed URL to the closest useful destination
- Crawl staging and document release blockers
-
02 Control phaseLaunch control
Verify the signals that can fail during the release window.
- Test redirects, status codes and canonical destinations
- Remove unintended noindex and crawl restrictions
- Confirm analytics, Search Console and sitemap continuity
- Check representative mobile and rendered output
-
03 Control phaseAfter launch
Monitor the old and new estates until the move is technically understood.
- Re-crawl mappings for chains, loops and missed URLs
- Compare indexation, traffic and server-error patterns
- Validate internal links, canonicals and sitemap adoption
- Triage regressions by impact and release dependency
Baseline documented
Release criteria agreed
Post-launch evidence monitored
Performance engineering
Improve the experience behind the score.
Field data describes what eligible real visitors experienced; lab tests help diagnose why. We use both without treating a single score as the business outcome.
≤ 2.5sLCP
≤ 200msINP
≤ 0.1CLS
Server response & caching
Review origin time, CDN behavior, cache policy and avoidable redirects.
JavaScript & third-party scripts
Reduce unnecessary execution and protect the main thread for useful interaction.
Images & media
Right-size delivery, responsive sources and priority loading without replacing approved originals.
CSS & render-blocking resources
Deliver critical presentation efficiently and remove avoidable blocking work.
Fonts & layout movement
Stabilise font loading and reserved space to reduce unexpected movement.
Mobile performance
Test constrained devices and networks rather than assuming desktop results transfer.
Platform-aware delivery
Work with the stack you actually operate.
The investigation adapts to hosted platforms, common CMSs, JavaScript applications, edge delivery and custom architecture.
WordPress
WooCommerce
Shopify
Webflow
Next.js and React
Magento
Cloudflare
.png)
Custom CMS
What you receive
Deliverables built to move work forward.
Technical findings report
Evidence, affected templates, representative URLs and the reason each issue matters.
Prioritised action plan
A sequence organised by impact, confidence, effort, dependency and risk.
Developer-ready instructions
Clear requirements, examples and acceptance criteria for implementation teams.
Crawl and indexation review
A structured view of discoverability, directives, canonicals, sitemaps and Page Indexing evidence.
Performance review
Field and lab evidence connected to template-level opportunities.
Implementation guidance
Working sessions and clarification while approved changes are built.
Post-implementation validation
Representative re-crawls, rendered checks and documented QA outcomes.
Ongoing monitoring options
A proportionate plan for material changes, regressions and unresolved dependencies.
Why RankSpell
Technical clarity that survives implementation.
We make the evidence understandable, the requirements testable and the release accountable.
- 01
Recommendations prioritised by impact
Important work is separated from low-value technical neatness.
- 02
SEO and performance expertise combined
Search access and real user experience are diagnosed as connected systems.
- 03
Implementation support included
Developers receive context, examples and testable requirements—not a spreadsheet of errors.
- 04
Validation after changes
A task is not treated as complete until representative output has been checked.
- 05
Solutions tailored to the website
Platform, templates, operating constraints and business value shape the recommendation.
Technical SEO FAQ
Clear answers before the crawl begins.
Scope, implementation and outcomes depend on the website—not a universal checklist.
What is included in a technical SEO audit?
The scope typically covers crawling, indexation, rendering, status codes, robots controls, canonicals, sitemaps, architecture, internal links, structured data, mobile output and performance. The final scope is adjusted to the platform, symptoms and business priorities.
Do you only audit, or do you help implement the fixes?
RankSpell can work with your developers or support implementation directly where the stack and access permit. Every approved change receives clear requirements and representative post-release validation.
Can technical SEO improve rankings?
Technical SEO can remove barriers and strengthen the conditions in which useful pages compete, but it cannot guarantee rankings or indexation. Relevance, quality, competition and wider signals still matter.
Can you improve Core Web Vitals?
We diagnose field and lab evidence, identify template-level causes and support implementation. Outcomes depend on the platform, third-party dependencies, traffic data and the changes the team can release.
Do you work with WordPress, Shopify and custom websites?
Yes. The method adapts to hosted platforms, common content-management systems, JavaScript applications and custom stacks. We confirm access, constraints and implementation ownership before proposing the scope.
How long does a technical SEO audit take?
A focused audit may take two to three weeks, while a large or complex estate can require longer. After discovery, RankSpell provides a realistic sequence based on site size, access, rendering complexity and evidence quality.